Oregon Senate passes ‘right to repair’ bill on fixing electronics

The Senate on Tuesday, Feb. 20, passed a bill that would give consumers more options to repair their home appliances and electronic devices.

The Senate voted 25-5 to pass Senate Bill 1596, a “right to repair” proposal aimed at widening consumer choice and lowering the costs of repairing electronic gear from laptops to smartphones and other devices that have a computer chip. The bill still needs to pass the House before going to Gov. Tina Kotek’s desk.

The bill, shepherded by Sen. Janeen Sollman, D-Hillsboro, would require manufacturers to offer tools, parts, devices and documentation needed to repair electronic devices at a “fair cost” and on “reasonable” terms. This means the bill would allow consumers to go to independent repair shops — or fix the devices themselves — instead of the manufacturer limiting where they could go, potentially for a more expensive price.

Sollman has fought for the passage of a right to repair bill since 2021. Her Senate District 15 includes Hillsboro and Forest Grove.

After Tuesday’s vote, Sollman said she was pleased to see the wide margin of support and the willingness of most major technology companies to remain neutral.

The Oregon Business & Industry, which represents about 1,600 businesses, as well as Intel, Amazon and Microsoft, are neutral. But Apple opposes the bill.

“The momentum was there,” Sollman said. “This has been a bill that has been worked on for so long.”

Charlie Fisher, Oregon director of OSPIRG, a statewide public interest group, said the vote reflects work unfolding in other states.

“It’s a bipartisan issue,” Fisher said. “It’s about helping consumers across the state. There’s momentum both in Oregon and across the country for (the) right to repair.”

The bill passed with bipartisan support and Sen. Kim Thatcher, R-Keizer, who signed on as a sponsor. In the vote, five Republicans were opposed: Sens. Tim Knopp, Daniel Bonham, Cedric Hayden, Dennis Linthicum and Art Robinson.

On the Senate floor, Bonham said the bill’s description of “fair” and “reasonable” for costs is open-ended and suggested the question would end up in the courts.

“I doubt we could come to a consensus on what is fair and reasonable,” he said, adding he doesn’t like leaving that up to the courts.

Bonham also said he cannot support the bill because it would force manufacturers to have business relationships with repair providers, regardless of whether they want to do so.

Oregon Capital Chronicle is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oregon Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Lynne Terry for questions: info@oregoncapitalchronicle.com. Follow Oregon Capital Chronicle on Facebook and X, formerly known as Twitter.


Recent Blogs